Pilots & Findings

From Ideas to Classrooms

The real test of an idea is what happens when it meets teaching and learning. The SchoolWorks Lab works with educators and schools to investigate our research questions in authentic learning environment.

Our pilot sites are not simply places where we introduce new technology—they are research partnerships.

Teachers help us investigate what learning evidence is useful, what is burdensome, what becomes visible over time, and whether better-organized evidence can improve instructional decision-making.

Our pilots bring together different ages, subjects, educational approaches, technologies, and cultural contexts.

That diversity is intentional.

Because if we want to understand learning, we need to study it where it actually happens.

Four Pilots. Different Contexts. Shared Questions.

Our current pilot program brings SchoolWorks research into schools in the United States, Australia, and India. Each setting allows us to investigate different dimensions of the same larger question: Can better evidence help us understand learning as it develops?

St. James Parish School

Melbourne, Victoria

Rich Learning Evidence

Investigating learning evidence within a Reggio Emilia-inspired environment

Our Australian partnership provides an especially important research setting because teaching and learning at St. James already emphasize observation, inquiry, student thinking, documentation, and multiple forms of evidence.

Teachers routinely encounter evidence that conventional assessments may not fully capture: conversations, student questions, creative work, collaboration, problem-solving, photographs, projects, reflections, and changes in thinking.”

What We Are Investigating:

  • Can these rich forms of classroom evidence be organized longitudinally without disrupting teaching?
  • Can patterns of developing understanding become more visible?
  • Can teacher observations and student work be considered alongside more conventional assessment information?
  • Can technology support documentation without diminishing the human relationships at the center of learning?


Research Focus:
Learning Patterns • Teacher Professional Judgment • Student Portfolios • Teacher Workload

Seabrook Middle School

Seabrook, New Hampshire

Learning Across Time

Investigating learning evidence in the everyday work of middle school classrooms

Middle school provides a very different research environment. Students encounter multiple subjects, assignments, assessments, digital resources, classroom conversations, and learning experiences — often within relatively short instructional periods.

Our work at Seabrook focuses on sixth-grade English Language Arts and Social Studies, where teachers can investigate learning through student writing, discussion, revision, analysis, projects, and other classroom evidence.

What We Are Investigating:

  • Can meaningful evidence be captured within the normal rhythm of a class period?
  • Can evidence from different learning experiences reveal patterns across time?
  • Can student portfolios help learners recognize changes in their own thinking?
  • Can teachers gain useful information without creating another documentation burden?


Research Focus: Teacher Workload • Learning Patterns • Student Portfolios • Professional Judgment

Winnacunnet High School

Hampton, New Hampshire

Teacher-Centered Evidence

Investigating a teacher-centered model for evidence-informed instruction

The Winnacunnet pilot allows us to investigate whether Pathfinder can support teachers without requiring students to adopt another digital platform.

This creates an important research question: How little technology is actually necessary to make learning evidence more useful?

The model emphasizes the teacher’s ability to capture and examine meaningful evidence while maintaining existing classroom practices and systems.

The high-school context also allows us to explore the relationship between rich learning evidence and existing requirements for curriculum, assessment, and accountability.

What We Are Investigating:

  • Can a teacher-centered evidence model work without requiring additional student devices or logins?
  • Can evidence collected during ordinary instruction support stronger professional judgment?
  • Can longitudinal evidence complement required assessments rather than compete with them?
  • Can the approach scale while remaining manageable for teachers?


Research Focus:
Teacher Workload • Professional Judgment • Interoperability • Learning Patterns

Stanvard Senior Secondary School

Udaipur, Rajasthan

Learning Across Contexts

Investigating learning evidence across educational and cultural contexts

Our India work extends the research into another educational setting and gives SchoolWorks an opportunity to examine one of the most important questions facing any proposed model of learning:

Does it travel?

Ideas about intelligence, evidence, teaching, assessment, and student development cannot simply be assumed to operate identically across cultures.

The India pilot therefore provides an important opportunity to test our assumptions rather than merely export them.”

What We Are Investigating:

  • Which forms of learning evidence remain meaningful across contexts?
  • Which assumptions reflect particular educational traditions?
  • How should the model adapt to local curriculum, teaching practices, technologies, and expectations?
  • What can educators in different countries learn from one another about recognizing student learning?

Research Focus: Cross-Cultural Validity • Learning Patterns • Professional Judgment • Adaptability

One Research Program

Although each pilot is different, the sites contribute to a common research agenda.

Research Question
Australia
Seabrook
Winnacunnet
India
Teacher Workload 
Learning Patterns
Professional Judgment
Student Portfolios  
Interoperability  
Cross-Cultural Validity  

Different classrooms. Different contexts. Shared questions.

Together, the pilots allow us to compare what happens across settings rather than drawing conclusions from a single implementation.

What We Will Examine

Across the pilot program, SchoolWorks will look for evidence related to several broad questions.

Feasibility 
Can educators actually use the approach during normal teaching?

Evidence Quality 
Does the information collected provide meaningful evidence of student learning?

Teacher Usefulness 
Does the evidence help teachers understand students or make instructional decisions?

Student Participation 
Can students meaningfully contribute to documenting and reflecting on their learning?

Teacher Workload 
Does the approach reduce, redistribute, or unintentionally increase teacher work?

Longitudinal Value 
Does evidence become more useful when examined across time?

Technology 
Can Pathfinder help organize and surface evidence without becoming another burden?

Transferability 
Which elements work across subjects, grade levels, schools, and countries — and which must change?

From Pilot Evidence to Findings

We Will Report What We Learn

This section of the SchoolWorks website will evolve as the pilots progress. For each pilot, we intend to document:

The Research Question 
What are we trying to understand?

The Context 
Where and with whom are we studying it?

The Approach 
What are teachers and researchers doing?

The Evidence 
What information are we examining?

What We Are Observing 
What patterns appear to be emerging?

Findings 
What conclusions does the evidence ultimately support?

Questions Raised
What do we need to investigate next?

This creates a public record not simply of our successes, but of our learning.

 

Findings — Not Testimonials

We believe this distinction matters.

  • A teacher saying that Pathfinder was helpful is valuable feedback. It is not, by itself, a research finding.
  • A student enjoying a portfolio is encouraging. It does not demonstrate that learning improved.
  • A promising classroom observation may generate a hypothesis. It does not prove the hypothesis.


SchoolWorks will distinguish experience, observation, emerging evidence, and research findings. That discipline is essential if our goal is to contribute trustworthy knowledge about learning.

What Happens Next?

Evidence from the pilots returns to the SchoolWorks research cycle.

Progression graphic: Research Question → Pilot Investigation → Learning Evidence → Analysis → Findings → Refined Theory → Improved Pathfinder Model → New Research Questions

The purpose of the pilots is not to prove that we were right. It is to help us discover what is true.

Follow the Research

The SchoolWorks Lab will share pilot updates, emerging observations, research reports, and findings as this work develops.